In the Privy Council

Maharaj v The Cabinet [2023] UKPC 17, T&T

Listen on

Episode notes

This week, we examine a case about statutory interpretation, and in particular, how to balance the courts’ interest in protecting democratic rights with their duty to implement the intentions of Parliament. Featuring a dissent from Lord Briggs of Westbourne! 

Link to case: [2023] UKPC 17, T&T


Legal Style Blog homepage


Twitter: @legalstyleblog


E-mail: [email protected]

Legal Style Blog Guide to Uniform Privy Council Citations